nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 12, No.505 73-85
海外并购与企业创新——基于全球创新网络嵌入的视角
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金青年项目“美国出口管制对我国全球创新网络地位提升的影响及对策研究”(24CJY006); 教育部哲学社会科学创新团队“金融科技与安全治理”; 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“提升中国、上海重点产业链供应链韧性与安全水平研究”(2024TRC001); 上海社会科学院重大系列课题“提升产业体系韧性和安全水平研究(2025ZD056)
邮箱(Email): 598960226@qq.com;
DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.12.006
摘要:

研究海外并购的创新效应,全球创新活动的网络化特征不容忽视。本文基于2010—2020年中国沪深A股上市公司数据,采用倾向得分匹配—双重差分(PSM-DID)模型实证检验海外并购对企业创新的影响及其作用机制。研究结果显示:海外并购能够促进企业创新,该结论在经过一系列稳健性检验后仍然成立;海外并购通过提升全球创新网络嵌入程度促进企业创新,提升内部知识吸收能力和海外市场熟悉程度能够强化海外并购的全球创新网络嵌入促进效应;海外并购对企业发明专利的促进作用更明显,发生在制度质量较高东道国的海外并购才具有创新效应。本文不仅有助于厘清海外并购对企业创新的作用机制,也为进一步提升中国科技创新自立自强能力提供了对策建议。

Abstract:

The networked characteristics of global innovation activities have become increasingly prominent. The United States, taking advantage of its advantageous position in the global innovation network, has continuously escalated technological containment against China. To further enhance the capability of independent and self-reliant technological innovation, enterprises are in urgent need to embed themselves in the global innovation network with a more proactive attitude, innovate the modes of outward investment and cooperation, and gradually build a network pattern that is “led by us” and “serving our needs”. Exploring issues such as whether outward investment activities like overseas mergers and acquisitions(M&As) can promote embedding in the global innovation network and thereby stimulate independent innovation, and by what means enterprises can embed in the network more efficiently, holds significant practical value.Based on the data from Chinese A-share listed companies in Shanghai and Shenzhen from 2010 to 2020, this paper adopts the propensity score matching-difference-in-differences(PSM-DID) method to empirically examine the impact of overseas M&As on corporate innovation and its mechanism. The research results are as follows. First, overseas M&As can promote corporate innovation. Second, the mechanism test reveals that promoting enterprises' embedding in the global innovation network is a key channel through which overseas M&As exert their innovation incentive effect. Third, further results show that improving internal knowledge absorption capacity and familiarity with overseas market operations can strengthen the effect of overseas M&As in promoting network embedding. Fourth, the heterogeneity analysis indicates that overseas M&As have a more significant effect on increasing the number of enterprises' invention patents, and only overseas M&As conducted in host countries with higher institutional quality have an innovation incentive effect.Compared with existing literature, the marginal contributions of this paper are mainly reflected in the following three aspects. First, it expands the research perspective in the field of overseas M&As. By incorporating the key characteristic of the networking of global innovation activities into the research framework, it provides a new perspective that is more in line with the global innovation pattern. Second, it deepens research on the mechanism of how overseas M&As affect corporate innovation. By constructing a global innovation network based on cross-enterprise knowledge flow and using node in-degree centrality to measure the level of network embedding, it more clearly reveals the micro-path through which overseas M&As influence corporate innovation by promoting network embedding. Third, the research conclusions have rich policy implications. It provides specific countermeasures for enterprises to embed in the global innovation network more efficiently from two perspectives: enhancing internal knowledge absorption capacity and improving external market familiarity.

参考文献

[1]余典范,王佳希,张家才.出口管制对中国企业创新的影响研究——以美国对华实体清单为例[J].经济学动态,2022(2):51-67.

[2]王佳希.我国核心技术自主创新动力机制的运行现状及优化举措研究[J].创新科技,2024,24(10):21-35.

[3]李梅,朱韵,李竹波.研发国际化与企业创新绩效:国有股权的调节作用[J].经济管理,2020,42(11):73-91.

[4]郑玮.国际化对开放式创新的影响——来自中国制造业上市公司的经验证据[J].国际贸易问题,2020(10):51-66.

[5]李雪松,党琳,赵宸宇.数字化转型、融入全球创新网络与创新绩效[J].中国工业经济,2022(10):43-61.

[6]刘瑶,程聪.中国企业跨国并购与全球价值链布局研究[J].财经问题研究,2019(1):44-51.

[7]贾镜渝,李文.距离、战略动机与中国企业跨国并购成败——基于制度和跳板理论[J].南开管理评论,2016,19(6):122-132.

[8]REUS T H, LAMONT B T. The double-edged sword of cultural distance in international acquisitions[J]. Journal of international business studies, 2009, 40(8):1298-1316.

[9]孙淑伟,何贤杰,王晨.文化距离与中国企业海外并购价值创造[J].财贸经济,2018,39(6):130-146.

[10]孙文莉,谢丹,李莉文.宏观风险对中国企业海外并购成功率的影响研究[J].经济学动态,2016(11):79-89.

[11]韩宝山.技术并购与创新:文献综述及研究展望[J].经济管理,2017,39(9):195-208.

[12]蒋冠宏,曾靓.融资约束与中国企业对外直接投资模式:跨国并购还是绿地投资[J].财贸经济,2020,41(2):132-145.

[13]臧成伟,蒋殿春.“主场优势”与国有企业海外并购倾向[J].世界经济,2020,43(6):52-76.

[14]李京晶,吴先明,廖凯诚.研发强度与跨境并购的价值创造:资产增强视角[J].华东经济管理,2024,38(12):97-107.

[15]胡潇婷,吕文晶,李纪珍.知识距离与中国海外并购企业的创新绩效:通途或天堑?[J].科学学与科学技术管理,2024,45(2):132-151.

[16]李鑫,魏姗.海外并购能否促进企业绿色创新水平提升?[J].外国经济与管理,2024,46(3):106-121.

[17]TAALBI J. Evolution and structure of technological systems—An innovation output network[J]. Research policy,2020,49(8):104010.

[18]MARIOTTI F, HAIDER S. Managing institutional diversity and structural holes:network configurations for recombinant innovation[J]. Technological forecasting and social change,2020,160(11):120237.

[19]刘洪愧,李希晨,姜丽,等.全球创新网络下的中国企业创新——跨国合作与质量提升[J].管理世界,2025,41(8):56-83.

[20]刘青,陶攀,洪俊杰.中国海外并购的动因研究——基于广延边际与集约边际的视角[J].经济研究,2017,52(1):28-43.

[21]王馗,高天惠,胡峰.中国企业海外并购动因和影响分析——与美国企业海外并购的比较[J].亚太经济,2022(1):93-101.

[22]万筱雯,杨波.企业跨国并购的协同创新效应[J].财经研究,2023,49(12):34-47.

[23]陈爱贞,刘志彪.以并购促进创新:基于全球价值链的中国产业困境突破[J].学术月刊,2016,48(12):63-74.

[24]吴先明,高厚宾,邵福泽.当后发企业接近技术创新的前沿:国际化的“跳板作用”[J].管理评论,2018,30(6):40-54.

[25]刘洋,魏江,江诗松.后发企业如何进行创新追赶?——研发网络边界拓展的视角[J].管理世界,2013,29(3):96-110+188.

[26]ROSENKOPF L, ALMEID P. Overcoming local search through alliances and mobility[J]. Management science,2003,49(6):751-766.

[27]师博,侯迎信,王铮.数字化转型如何赋能企业突破式创新?[J].财经问题研究,2025(3):58-69.

[28]ZACCHIA P. Knowledge spillovers through networks of scientists[J]. The review of economic studies,2019,87(4):1989-2018.

[29]黄远浙,钟昌标,叶劲松,等.跨国投资与创新绩效——基于对外投资广度和深度视角的分析[J].经济研究,2021,56(1):138-154.

[30]冼国明,明秀南.海外并购与企业创新[J].金融研究,2018(8):155-171.

[31]马淑琴,徐苗,张陈宇.数据要素应用与企业创新效应——来自中国A股上市公司的经验证据[J].商业经济与管理,2024(2):50-67.

[32]NOCKE V, YEAPLE S. Cross border mergers and acquisitions greenfield foreign direct investment:the role of firm heterogeneity[J]. Journal of international economics,2007,72(2):336-365.

[33]STIEBALE J. Cross-border M&A and innovative activity of acquiring and target firms[J]. Journal of international economics,2016,99(2):1-15.

[34]张杰,陈志远,杨连星,等.中国创新补贴政策的绩效评估:理论与证据[J].经济研究,2015,50(10):4-17+33.

[35]余典范,王佳希.政府补贴对不同生命周期企业创新的影响研究[J].财经研究,2022,48(1):19-33.

[36]AHUJA G, KATILA R. Technological acquisitions and the innovation performance of acquiring firms:a longitudinal study[J]. Strategic management journal,2001,22(3):197-220.

[37]CAI J, LI N. Growth through intersectoral knowledge linkages[J]. Review of economic studies,2019,86(5):1827-1866.

[38]陶锋,张会勤,李红.外部知识溢出、研发双重效应与企业创新绩效[J].财经问题研究,2018(5):44-51.

[39]COHEN W M, LEVINTHAL D A. Absorptive capacity:a new perspective on learning and innovation[J].Administrative science quarterly,1990,35(1):128-152.

[40]黎文靖,郑曼妮.实质性创新还是策略性创新?——宏观产业政策对微观企业创新的影响[J].经济研究,2016,51(4):60-73.

(1)利用美国专利商标局(占据绝对优U势S地PT位O)专利文本信息构建全球创新网络的理由包括三个方面。一是美国在当前的创新竞争中仍,并采取了一系列遏制中国企业创新发展的措施。基于美国数据库构建全球创新网络可以更好地体现美国对华创新遏制升级的新趋势,验证海外并购在这一新趋势下是否仍能提升全球创新网络嵌入程度。二是本文对美国专利商标局(((地U区S)PT节O)专利文本信息进行初步分析后发现,点,可以充分体现创新网络的全球化。2三02是0年以国家地区)为节点的网络中,包含了157个国家美国专利商标局(USPTO)专利文本信息格式统一、规整,数据质量高,在创新网络的相关研究中被广泛运用。

(2)平衡性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

(1)稳健性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

(1)构建互引网络而非合作网络的原因包括两个方面。一是企业专利权人倾向于专利独占而非联合申请,合作研发无法从显性的专利文本信息中精准识别。二是本文的研究重点是企业的外部知识获取,专利互引能更好地体现知识的跨企业流动。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.12.006

中图分类号:F832.51;F273.1;F271;F125

引用信息:

[1]王佳希,余典范,杨翘楚.海外并购与企业创新——基于全球创新网络嵌入的视角[J].财经问题研究,2025,No.505(12):73-85.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.12.006.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金青年项目“美国出口管制对我国全球创新网络地位提升的影响及对策研究”(24CJY006); 教育部哲学社会科学创新团队“金融科技与安全治理”; 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题“提升中国、上海重点产业链供应链韧性与安全水平研究”(2024TRC001); 上海社会科学院重大系列课题“提升产业体系韧性和安全水平研究(2025ZD056)

检 索 高级检索