| 98 | 0 | 180 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
研究气候风险对经济社会的影响是防控风险事件发生与蔓延的重要议题。本文基于生产网络视角,以2005年1月—2023年12月31个申万一级行业为样本,采用包含行业间投入产出关联的异质性空间自回归(HSAR)模型,实证检验气候风险对中国行业尾部风险的直接效应和网络效应。研究结果显示:转型风险和物理风险均能加剧中国行业尾部风险,其中,生产网络是气候风险影响中国行业尾部风险的重要渠道,由生产网络带来的网络效应占总效应的比重超过40%,且该结论在经过内生性检验和稳健性检验后仍然成立;在转型风险和物理风险影响下,社会服务和基础化工行业受到的网络效应影响最为显著;相较于前向关联,后向关联下中国行业尾部风险受到的网络效应更强;在两类风险中,转型风险对中国行业尾部风险的影响占主导地位。本文为中国有效防范气候风险、精准把握生产网络的风险传导特征提供了实证支持。
Abstract:Currently, China is increasingly confronted with severe climate risks. Understanding the socioeconomic impacts of these risks is crucial for mitigating and managing the manifestation and contagion of risk events. Climate risks, encompassing both physical and transition risks, are continuously propagating adverse shocks from ecosystems to the broader economic system. Empirical evidence indicates that climate risks have inflicted significant damage across various Chinese sectors. These impacts entail both direct shocks and indirect ripple effects within the economic system, heavily driven by the underlying production networks. Therefore, overlooking production networks may substantially underestimate the true economic consequences of climate risks. However, existing literature rarely examines the economic consequences of climate risks from a macro-sectoral perspective. Specifically, there is a lack of research exploring the impact of climate risks on sectoral tail risks in China, particularly regarding the transmission mechanisms embedded in production networks. To address this gap, this paper constructs a Heterogeneous Spatial Autoregressive(HSAR) model incorporating inter-sectoral input-output linkages. From a production network perspective, we measure both the direct and network effects of climate risks on sectoral tail risks in China. We compare the heterogeneous impacts of physical and transition risks, and further investigate their primary transmission directions along the supply chain by incorporating forward and backward sectoral linkages.The results indicate that: First, increases in both physical and transition risks significantly exacerbate sectoral tail risks, with network effects driven by inter-sectoral input-output linkages accounting for over 40% of the total impact. Second, both risk types propagate through the production network, driving up tail risks across all sectors. Notably, the social services and basic chemical sectors experience the most pronounced network effects. Third, the network effects are stronger through backward linkages than forward linkages, indicating that climate risks are primarily transmitted from upstream to downstream sectors along the supply chain. Fourth, between the two risk types, transition risks exert a dominant impact on sectoral tail risks in China.This paper makes several contributions to the existing literature. First, it enriches the study of the economic consequences of climate risks at the sectoral level by focusing on tail risks and examining heterogeneous impacts across sectors. Second, it provides a comprehensive assessment by dual-dimensionally incorporating both physical and transition risks. Third, by adopting a production network perspective, the paper disentangles the direct and network effects of climate risks and identifies their primary transmission directions. Ultimately, this study provides empirical evidence and actionable insights for policymakers to effectively mitigate climate risks and manage risk contagion within production networks. These findings are of great significance for enhancing China's economic resilience and ensuring macroeconomic stability.insights for policymakers to effectively mitigate climate risks and manage risk contagion within production networks.
[1]李政,张冰,刘琦.城投债信用风险空间溢出效应研究:基于区域生产网络视角[J].现代金融研究,2025,30(6):18-32.
[2]MENDELSOHN R, NORDHAUS W D, SHAW D. The impact of global warming on agriculture:a Ricardian analysis[J]. The American economic review,1994,84(4):753-771.
[3]SCHLENKER W, ROBERTS M J. Nonlinear temperature effects indicate severe damages to US crop yields under climate change[J]. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences,2009,106(37):15594-15598.
[4]丁宇刚,孙祁祥.气候风险对中国农业经济发展的影响——异质性及机制分析[J].金融研究,2022(9):111-131.
[5]金刚,沈坤荣.气候变化与线下服务业消费:以电影行业为例[J].世界经济,2022,45(9):152-178.
[6]陈国进,陈凌凌,金昊,等.气候转型风险与宏观经济政策调控[J].经济研究,2023,58(5):60-78.
[7]BURKE M, HSIANG S M, MIGUEL E. Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production[J]. Nature,2015,7577(527):235-239.
[8]陈海山,陈志龙.气候风险、经济增长与城市内涵式发展——基于暴雨冲击的经验证据[J].统计研究,2024,41(6):121-134.
[9]KOCORNIK-MINA A, MCDERMOTT T K, MICHAELS G, et al. Flooded cities[J].American economic journal:applied economics,2020,12(2):35-66.
[10]郝大鹏.极端天气冲击下的风险传导与“双支柱”调控策略研究[J].金融监管研究,2025(7):1-21.
[11]杨子晖,李东承,陈雨恬.金融市场的“绿天鹅”风险研究——基于物理风险与转型风险的双重视角[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):47-67.
[12]赵胜民,彭馨漫,王超.气候物理风险如何向金融部门传染——基于银企借贷联系渠道的分析[J].金融监管研究,2025(5):31-53.
[13]申宇,佘楷文,许闲.气候风险与银行盈余管理——基于金融监管的视角[J].金融研究,2023(7):116-133.
[14]GRIFFIN P, LONT D, LUBBERINK M. Extreme high surface temperature events and equity-related physical climate risk[J]. Weather and climate extremes,2019,26:100220.
[15]盛丹,张国峰.两控区环境管制与企业全要素生产率增长[J].管理世界,2019,35(2):24-42.
[16]陈国进,王佳琪,赵向琴.气候转型风险对企业违约率的影响[J].管理科学,2023,36(3):144-159.
[17]HSU P H, LI K, TSOU C Y. The pollution premium[J]. Journal of finance,2023,78(3):1343-1392.
[18]PANKRATZ N, BAUER R, DERWALL J. Climate change, firm performance, and investor surprises[J].Management science,2023,69(12):7352-7398.
[19]GINGLINGER E, MOREAU Q. Climate risk and capital structure[J].Management science,2023,69(12):7492-7516.
[20]李香花,谢梦瑶,王敏.气候风险与企业投融资期限错配[J].现代财经(天津财经大学学报),2025,45(3):101-114.
[21]李政,蔡昕雨,武坤.气候风险、生产网络关联与企业集团内部现金分布[J].财贸经济,2025,46(10):71-88.
[22]李政,蔡昕雨,李薇.极端气候地域差异与企业集团内部现金转移——来自暴雨冲击的证据[J].金融监管研究,2025(11):56-76.
[23]杨璐,史京晔,陈晓光.温度变化对中国工业生产的影响及其机制分析[J].经济学(季刊),2020,20(5):299-320.
[24]DESSAINT O, MATRAY A. Do managers overreact to salient risks? Evidence from hurricane strikes[J]. Journal of financial economics,2017,126(1):97-121.
[25]王文蔚.气候冲击与企业违约风险:基于物理风险的视角[J].世界经济,2025,48(3):90-110.
[26]HOSONO K, MIYAKAWA D, UCHINO T, et al. Natural disasters, damage to banks, and firm investment[J].International economic review,2016,57(4):1335-1370.
[27]LI Q, SHAN H, TANG Y, et al. Corporate climate risk:measurements and responses[J]. Review of financial studies,2024,37(6):1778-1830.
[28]ACEMOGLU D, AKCIGIT U, KERR W. Networks and the macroeconomy:an empirical exploration[J].NBER macroeconomics annual,2016,30(1):273-335.
[29]陈国进,刘元月,丁赛杰,等.宏观尾部风险、生产网络与行业产出[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):28-52.
[30]李薇,李政.全球生产网络与尾部风险跨国传染[J].国际金融研究,2025(12):47-60.
[31]ENGLE R F, MANGANELLI S. CAViaR:conditional autoregressive value at risk by regression quantiles[J]. Journal of business economic statistics,2004,22(4):367-381.
[32]BUA G, KAPP D, RAMELLA F, et al. Transition versus physical climate risk pricing in European financial markets:a text-based approach[J]. European journal of finance,2024,30(17):2076-2110.
[33]DI GIOVANNI J, HALE G. Stock market spillovers via the global production network:transmission of US monetary policy[J]. Journal of finance,2022,77(6):3373-3421.
[34]周颖刚,肖潇.汇率波动、生产网络与股市风险——基于中美贸易摩擦背景的分析[J].金融研究,2022(7):115-134.
[35]LESAGE J, PACE R K. Introduction to spatial econometrics[M]. New York:Chapman and Hall/CRC,2009:33-42.
[36]李政,李薇,李丽雯.美国三类不确定性冲击、生产网络传导与中国行业尾部风险[J].金融研究,2024(8):39-57.
[37]李政,石晴.全球地缘政治冲击、生产网络传导与中国行业信用风险[J].国际金融研究,2026(2):45-59.
(1)近年来,气候风险通过生产网络加剧中国行业尾部风险的现象时有发生。例如,2022年,四川极端高温导致工业用电受限,光伏上游产区硅料产能萎缩;硅料价格上涨迫使隆基绿能等中游企业毛利率承压,负面影响蔓延致行业尾部风险激增。2023年7月,京津冀特大暴雨致多家上游汽车零部件企业停产,供应链中断;下游主机厂被迫将日均产量腰斩,单车边际成本激增;资本市场震荡,多家汽车制造企业股票价格暴跌,并外溢至上游钢铁厂,加剧行业尾部风险。
(1)若i行业的产出作为j行业的生产投入,则i行业为j行业的上游,即对于i行业而言,其与j行业的关系为前向关联;若i行业需要消耗j行业的产出,则i行业为j行业的下游,即对于i行业而言,其与j行业的关系为后向关联。
(2)申万一级行业是由上海申银万国证券研究所制定的行业分类标准。
(1)气候风险对31个行业尾部风险的AAK分解结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。
(2)非银金融和银行为金融行业,其余29个行业为实体行业,取每类行业直接效应和网络效应之和的算术平均衡量其总效应。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.005
中图分类号:P467;F124
引用信息:
[1]李政,张冰,武坤.气候风险、生产网络与中国行业尾部风险[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.509(04):62-74.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.005.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“经济金融风险在生产网络中的传导机制与防范对策研究”(24FJYB027);国家社会科学基金重大项目“绿色金融发展实践与政策支持研究”(25ZD128);国家社会科学基金一般项目“‘双循环’背景下粮食安全与汇率稳定的交互影响、作用机理及应对策略研究”(24BJY084)
2026-04-05
2026-04-05