nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, No.507 47-61
新型工业化如何提升企业韧性——基于“两化融合”贯标试点政策的准自然实验
基金项目(Foundation): 教育部人文社会科学后期资助项目“以民营资本发展促中小金融机构安全”(24JHQ078)
邮箱(Email): xuk@swufe.edu.cn;
DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.004
发布时间: 2026-02-05
出版时间: 2026-02-05
移动端阅读
摘要:

在全球技术封锁叠加产业链供应链重构的双重冲击背景下,以“两化融合”贯标试点政策强化数智时代工业竞争力和提升企业韧性具有重要的现实意义。本文基于2010—2023年中国沪深A股上市公司数据,运用多时点双重差分模型考察“两化融合”贯标试点政策对企业韧性的影响及作用机制。研究结果表明,“两化融合”贯标试点政策能够提升企业韧性,该结论在经过一系列内生性检验和稳健性检验后依然成立。机制检验结果表明,“两化融合”贯标试点政策通过提高企业敏捷响应度、提高企业风险承担水平和提高企业资源配置效率提升企业韧性。异质性分析结果表明,“两化融合”贯标试点政策对中西部地区企业、高融资成本企业韧性的提升效应更明显,对国有企业、非国有企业、数字产业化企业、非数字产业化企业、产业数字化程度高企业、产业数字化程度低企业的韧性具有普适性的提升效应。本文的研究结论为加快推动中国新型工业化和提升企业韧性提供了理论支撑和政策参考。

Abstract:

In the current context of intensified global technological competition and increased uncertainty in supply chains, enhancing enterprise resilience has become a key issue for promoting new industrialization and high-quality development. The deep integration of informatization and industrialization, as a national strategy, still requires systematic examination of its impact mechanism and effects on enterprises, especially the lack of policy effect assessment based on microdata. Strengthening industrial competitiveness in the digital and intelligent era through the “integration of informatization and industrialization” standardization pilot policy has significant practical significance.This paper uses the pilot policy of “integration of informatization and industrialization” as a quasi-natural experiment. Based on the data of Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023, it conducts an empirical test using a multi-period difference-in-differences(DID) model. This paper finds that the pilot policy of “integration of informatization and industrialization” can significantly enhance enterprise resilience. After passing parallel trend tests, placebo tests, heterogeneity treatment effects, double machine learning, and other robustness tests and endogeneity tests, the research conclusion remains valid. The mechanism analysis shows that the policy enhances enterprise resilience mainly through strengthening enterprises' agile response capability, increasing risk-taking levels, and optimizing resource allocation efficiency. Considering that macro-environmental characteristics, micro-enterprise characteristics, and meso-characteristics can all produce different heterogeneity results, this paper conducts sample regression. The heterogeneity analysis results indicate that the pilot policy of “integration of informatization and industrialization” enhances the resilience of enterprises in central and western regions and those with high financing costs. The distinction should be more pronounced between state-owned enterprises, non-state-owned enterprises, digital industrialization enterprises, non-digital industrialization enterprises, enterprises with high industrial digitalization levels, and industrial digitalization.This paper expands the micro-effect assessment of the pilot policy of “integration of informatization and industrialization” from the perspective of enterprise resilience, providing empirical evidence for understanding how new industrialization enhances enterprise resilience. Additionally, the research conclusion provides references for promoting digital transformation in a classified manner and optimizing industrial policies, and provides policy implications for enhancing the resilience of the real economy in complex external environments.

参考文献

[1]杜传忠,张榕.健全促进数实深度融合的体制机制研究[J].财经问题研究,2024(12):16-27.

[2]蒋峦,凌宇鹏,张吉昌,等.数字化转型如何影响企业韧性?——基于双元创新视角[J].技术经济,2022,41(1):1-11.

[3]GALLOP??N G C. Linkages between vulnerability, resilience, and adaptive capacity[J]. Global environmental change,2006,16(3):293-303.

[4]SCHOLZ R W, BLUMER Y B, BRAND F S. Risk, vulnerability, robustness, and resilience from a decision-theoretic perspective[J]. Journal of risk research,2012,15(3):313-330.

[5]HOLLING S C. Resilience and stability of ecological systems[J]. Annual review of ecology and systematics,1973,4(1):1-23.

[6]胡海峰,宋肖肖,窦斌.数字化在危机期间的价值:来自企业韧性的证据[J].财贸经济,2022,43(7):134-148.

[7]王勇,蔡娟.企业组织韧性量表发展及其信效度验证[J].统计与决策,2019,35(5):178-181.

[8]单宇,许晖,周连喜,等.数智赋能:危机情境下组织韧性如何形成?——基于林清轩转危为机的探索性案例研究[J].管理世界,2021,37(3):84-104.

[9]胡媛媛,陈守明,仇方君.企业数字化战略导向、市场竞争力与组织韧性[J].中国软科学,2021(S1):214-225.

[10]袁淳,肖土盛,耿春晓,等.数字化转型与企业分工:专业化还是纵向一体化[J].中国工业经济,2021(9):137-155.

[11]陶锋,王欣然,徐扬,等.数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J].中国工业经济,2023(5):118-136.

[12]张钦成,杨明增.企业数字化转型与内部控制质量——基于“两化融合”贯标试点的准自然实验[J].审计研究,2022(6):117-128.

[13]李磊,刘常青,韩民春.信息化建设能够提升企业创新能力吗?——来自“两化融合试验区”的证据[J].经济学(季刊),2022,22(3):1079-1100.

[14]DUBEY R, GUNASEKARAN A, CHILDE S J, et al. Empirical investigation of data analytics capability and organizational flexibility as complements to supply chain resilience[J]. International journal of production research,2021,9(1):110-128.

[15]史丹,李少林.新冠肺炎疫情冲击下企业生存韧性研究——来自中国上市公司的证据[J].经济管理,2022,44(1):5-26.

[16]戚聿东,肖旭.数字经济时代的企业管理变革[J].管理世界,2020,36(6):135-152.

[17]范合君,潘宁宁.数字化转型、敏捷响应度与企业韧性[J].经济管理,2024,46(7):36-54.

[18]蒋为,倪诗程,彭淼.数实融合与企业出口产品策略优化:基于柔性生产视角[J].世界经济,2024,47(5):3-33.

[19]马潇宇,黄明珠,杨朦晰.供应链韧性影响因素研究:基于SEM与fsQCA方法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2023,43(9):2484-2501.

[20]AHAMMAD M F, GLAISTER K W, GOMES E. Strategic agility and human resource management[J]. Human resource management review,2020,30(1):100700.

[21]付晓改,符加林,陈欢欢,等.数字化转型有利于降低制造业企业成本粘性吗?——基于内部控制和信息不对称视角的分析[J].工程管理科技前沿,2024,43(4):76-82.

[22]何瑛,于文蕾,杨棉之.CEO复合型职业经历、企业风险承担与企业价值[J].中国工业经济,2019(9):155-173.

[23]ZENG J, GLAISTER K W. Value creation from big data:looking inside the black box[J]. Strategic organization,2018,16(2):105-140.

[24]罗珉,刘永俊.企业动态能力的理论架构与构成要素[J].中国工业经济,2009(1):75-86.

[25]逯进,周克圣,王恩泽.信息化与工业化融合能否促进企业出口“增量提质”?[J].产业经济研究,2024(5):100-113.

[26]魏龙,蔡培民,潘安.供应链冲击、多元化战略与企业发展韧性——来自中国重大自然灾害的证据[J].中国工业经济,2024(9):118-136.

[27]沈坤荣,乔刚,林剑威.智能制造政策与中国企业高质量发展[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2024,41(2):5-25.

[28]胡洁,于宪荣,韩一鸣.ESG评级能否促进企业绿色转型?——基于多时点双重差分法的验证[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(7):90-111.

[29]BODORY H, HUBER M, LAFFERS L. Evaluating(weighted)dynamic treatment effects by double machine learning[J]. Econometrics journal, 2022,25(3):628-648.

[30]LIU L, WANG Y, XU Y. A practical guide to counterfactual estimators for causal inference with time-series cross-sectional data[J]. American journal of political science,2024,68(1):160-176.

[31]RAMBACHAN A, ROTH J. A more credible approach to parallel trends[J]. Review of economic studies,2023,90(5):2555-2591.

[32]许文立,孙磊.市场激励型环境规制与能源消费结构转型——来自中国碳排放权交易试点的经验证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023,40(7):133-155.

[33]SUN L, ABRAHAM S. Estimating dynamic treatment effects in event studies with heterogeneous treatment effects[J]. Journal of econometrics,2021,225(2):175-199.

[34]BORUSYAK K, JARAVEL X, SPIESS J. Revisiting event-study designs:robust and efficient estimation[J].Review of economic studies,2024,91(6):3253-3285.

[35]CENGIZ D, DUBE A, LINDNER A, et al. The effect of minimum wages on low-wage jobs[J]. Quarterly journal of economics, 2019,134(3):1405-1454.

[36]李晓翔,孔梦情.数字化转型对组织韧性的影响研究——基于环境不确定性的调节效应[J].吉林工商学院学报,2023,39(5):49-55.

[37]沈小波,陈语,林伯强.技术进步和产业结构扭曲对中国能源强度的影响[J].经济研究,2021,56(2):157-173.

[38]吴非,胡慧芷,林慧妍,等.企业数字化转型与资本市场表现——来自股票流动性的经验证据[J].管理世界,2021,37(7):130-144.

[39]庞磊,丁文丽.数字经济提升了产业链关键环节的控制能力吗?——基于数字产业化和产业数字化的对比研究[J].科学学研究,2024,42(3):541-553.

(1)稳健性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.004

中图分类号:F425;F832.51

引用信息:

[1]郭仕利,薛寒忆,许坤.新型工业化如何提升企业韧性——基于“两化融合”贯标试点政策的准自然实验[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.507(02):47-61.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.004.

基金信息:

教育部人文社会科学后期资助项目“以民营资本发展促中小金融机构安全”(24JHQ078)

发布时间:

2026-02-05

出版时间:

2026-02-05

检 索 高级检索