nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo searchdiv qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2025, 10, No.503 14-26
居民消费的阻碍因素与消费长效机制构建思路——宏观政策“三策合一”的视角
基金项目(Foundation): 中国社会科学院青年人文社会科学研究中心社会调研项目“居民消费的阻碍因素与提振策略研究——基于大数据与机器学习方法的新证据”(2026QNZX010)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.10.002
摘要:

在中央和各级地方政府的共同努力下,中国居民消费水平持续提升,但居民消费率仍有待提升,居民尤其是城镇居民消费倾向有待提高,居民消费信心和消费意愿有待增强,因而如何进一步提振居民消费是“十五五”时期的重要议题。中国居民消费不足的原因在于,居民消费不仅面临短期因素的影响,还面临长期潜在经济增速放缓等长期性因素和社会保障体系不健全、收入分配结构不合理等结构性因素的阻碍,以及高质量产品和服务供给不足、消费环境不佳的影响。西方宏观政策理论对长期经济增长和宏观经济结构问题的关注不足,难以为提振中国居民消费提供有效对策。宏观政策“三策合一”理论实现了对西方宏观政策理论的突破,能够设计出适合中国的居民消费长效机制。第一,宏观政策“三策合一”理论能够解决西方宏观政策理论所忽视的长期潜在经济增速放缓问题,通过提升长期潜在经济增速来持续提高居民可支配收入,助力居民“能消费”。第二,宏观政策“三策合一”理论能够解决西方宏观政策理论所忽视的结构性问题,消除结构性问题对居民消费的阻碍,助力居民尤其是中低收入群体“敢消费”。第三,宏观政策“三策合一”理论能够解决西方宏观政策理论所忽视的供给侧问题,提升高质量产品和服务的供需匹配程度,助力居民尤其是高收入群体“愿消费”。

Abstract:

With the joint efforts of the central and local governments, household consumption has improved to a certain extent. However, there is still insufficient household consumption, mainly reflected in the low consumption rate, low consumption propensity, and low consumption confidence of the resident sector. This study finds that the reason why China has long been in a state of insufficient household consumption is that household consumption is not only affected by short-term adverse factors but also hindered by long-term and structural factors, such as the slowdown of economic growth momentum and economic structural imbalance. First, with the slowdown of economic growth, the growth rate of residents' income has continued to slow down, making some residents “unable to consume”. Second, structural factors such as the imperfect social security system and the imbalance in the income distribution structure have made some residents, especially middle and low income groups,“ dare not consume”. Third, the insufficient supply of high-quality products and services, coupled with an unsatisfactory household consumption environment, has led to prominent problems of mismatch between supply and demand, making some residents “unwilling to consume”.Western macroeconomic policy theories are not only difficult to cope with the obstacles to household consumption caused by long-term problems such as the slowdown of long-term potential growth and the imbalance of income distribution structure but also hard to optimize the quality of products and services from the supply side. Therefore, it is difficult to provide targeted suggestions for boosting China's consumption. In contrast, the macro-policy trinity theory derived from China's policy practice not only focuses on short-term regulation but also incorporates long-term growth and economic structure into the analytical framework, making it more suitable for providing theoretical support for the construction of a long-term mechanism for China's household consumption. The results of this study show that through the macro-policy trinity theory, we can increase the long-term potential growth rate, continuously improve residents' disposable income, and better help residents “be able to consume”; improve the social security system and income distribution structure, eliminate residents' worries, and better help residents, especially middle and low income groups “dare to consume”; and improve the quality of products and services, solve the problem of supply-demand mismatch, and better help residents, especially high-income groups, “be willing to consume”. Thus, a long-term mechanism can be designed to encourage residents to “be able to consume”, “dare to consume”, and “be willing to consume”.

参考文献

[1]宋泽,邹红,赵达.中国消费内生动力:收入增长下的涓滴效应研究[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023(1):5-24.

[2]张全红,周强.精准扶贫政策效果评估——收入、消费、生活改善和外出务工[J].统计研究,2019,36(10):17-29.

[3]扩大内需战略研究课题组,史丹.论高质量供给引领和创造新需求[J].经济学动态,2023(11):3-19.

[4]王建明,赵婧.数字时代信息嵌入式监管工具对线上绿色消费行为的推进效应——绿色购买场景模拟和监管工具设计实验[J].管理世界,2022,38(4):142-162.

[5]陈彦斌.宏观政策“三策合一”新理论框架[J].经济研究,2022,57(11):29-47.

[6]王蕴,姜雪,李清彬,等.消费倾向的国际比较与促进中国消费倾向稳步提升的建议[J].宏观经济研究,2022(3):30-45.

[7]刘哲希,陈彦斌.消费疲软之谜与扩大消费之策[J].财经问题研究,2018(11):3-12.

[8]陈彦斌,陈伟泽.潜在增速缺口与宏观政策目标重构——兼以中国实践评西方主流宏观理论的缺陷[J].经济研究,2021,56(3):14-31.

[9]陈小亮,陈彦斌.结构政策的内涵、意义与实施策略——宏观政策“三策合一”的视角[J].中国高校社会科学,2022(3):62-72.

[10]陈小亮.宏观政策取向一致性评估探析:基于健全宏观经济治理体系的视角[J].改革,2025(1):16-25.

(1)虽然现有研究重点关注了收入不平等对居民消费的影响,但尚未充分考虑收入不平等与社会保障体系不健全等因素之间的相互影响,也未从消费长效机制和政策协调配合的角度进行研究。

(1)根据世界银行2025年发布的经济体收入划分标准,高收入国家的门槛值为人均国民总收入13 935美元。

(1)本文根据历年《中国统计年鉴》资金流量表中住户部门资金来源的劳动者报酬、可支配总收入计算得到。

(1)如果只分析不同群体的收入增速,可能会对收入分配结构的变化产生误判。例如,2013—2024年,全国低收入户、中间偏下收入户、中间收入户、中间偏上收入户、高收入户的人均可支配收入增速分别为7.3%、7.6%、7.3%、7.4%、6.9%。因此,仅从收入增速来看,收入分配结构似乎有所改善。但是,不同群体的收入绝对水平存在较大差异,“基数效应”的存在导致收入分配结构并未改善。中间收入户的人均可支配收入从2013年的15 698元增加至2024年的33 925元,增幅为18 227元;同期高收入户的人均可支配收入从47 457元增加至98 809元,增幅为51 352元。可见,2013—2024年,高收入户的人均可支配收入增幅达到中间收入户的2.8倍。这与图5所展示的不同群体收入占比的走势一致。

(1)宏观政策“三策合一”数据库网址:www.mpt-index.cn。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.10.002

中图分类号:F126.1

引用信息:

[1]陈小亮.居民消费的阻碍因素与消费长效机制构建思路——宏观政策“三策合一”的视角[J].财经问题研究,2025,No.503(10):14-26.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.10.002.

基金信息:

中国社会科学院青年人文社会科学研究中心社会调研项目“居民消费的阻碍因素与提振策略研究——基于大数据与机器学习方法的新证据”(2026QNZX010)

检 索 高级检索