| 2,479 | 33 | 49 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
提升医疗服务价值是医保DRG付费改革的核心目标。本文基于H市医保DRG付费改革前后长达6年的医保结算月度数据,采用中断时间序列分析方法,从医疗服务成本、医疗服务效率和医疗服务质量三个维度,研究了医保DRG付费改革对医疗服务价值的促进作用。研究发现,医保DRG付费改革通过“结余留用”的激励机制倒逼医疗机构控费增效,降低了医疗服务成本,提升了医疗服务效率,也优化了费用结构,特别是通过费用结构的“腾笼换鸟”实现了医务性收入占比的上升。但是,随着改革的深入推进,出现了医疗服务质量下降等问题。对此,本文认为应从“支付—监管—评价”三位一体的政策优化视角完善DRG付费体系。
Abstract:Excessive medical treatment is a persistent problem in China's healthcare system, leading to unreasonable increases in medical expenses, burdening patients, wasting resources, and affecting the sustainability of medical insurance funds. Fee-for-service(FFS) payment fails to effectively curb excessive medical treatment, necessitating a reform of medical insurance payment methods. As a crucial practice in China's medical insurance payment reform, empirical research on whether DRG payment enhances the value of medical services is necessary to provide evidence-based support for policy improvement.Value-based healthcare emphasizes reducing costs while ensuring the quality of diagnosis and treatment, improving patient outcomes and health performance, and pursuing “the highest cost-effectiveness of medical care”. Therefore, medical costs, service efficiency, and service quality are critical dimensions for evaluating value-based healthcare. Based on 72 months of monthly medical insurance settlement data from 50 medical institutions in H City before and after the DRG payment reform, this paper employs an interrupted time series regression method of quasi-experimental research to comprehensively assess the impact of DRG on medical value in three dimensions: medical service cost, medical service efficiency, and medical service quality. This paper finds that the DRG payment reform has achieved phased results, driving medical institutions to control costs and increase efficiency through the “keep the surplus” incentive mechanism, reducing medical service costs, improving medical service efficiency, optimizing cost structure, and particularly enhancing the proportion of medical income through the “reallocation of funds”. However, it is essential to note and be vigilant about issues such as weakened cost control effects, hospitalization segmentation, and decreased medical service quality as the DRG reform deepens. Additionally, the DRG payment reform has heterogeneous effects on different levels of medical institutions, particularly in the optimization path of cost structure.The marginal contributions of this paper lie in the following aspects. Firstly, it comprehensively examines the impact of DRG payment reform from the perspective of value-based healthcare and its multidimensional implications of service cost, service efficiency, and service quality. Secondly, it depicts the policy effects and their changes over a long six-year period before and after the reform, contributing to the discovery of time effects. Thirdly, it analyzes the heterogeneity of the DRG payment reform's impact on different levels of medical institutions, especially primary-level medical institutions,which are relatively neglected in existing research. The findings of this study provide a solid foundation for further optimizing DRG payment policies.
[1]廖藏宜.医疗保险付费对医生诊疗行为的激励约束效果——经济学解释与政策机制[J].财经问题研究,2018(3):28-37.
[2] PORTER M E, TEISBERG E O. Redefining health care:creating value-based competition on results[M]. Boston:Harvard Business Press,2006:1.
[3] SHLEIFER A. A theory of yardstick competition[J]. Rand journal of economics,1985,16(3):319-327.
[4]顾昕,郭科.从按项目付费到按价值付费:美国老人医疗保险支付制度改革[J].东岳论丛,2018,39(10):79-87.
[5]郭科,顾昕.过度医疗的解决之道:管制价格、强化竞争还是改革付费?[J].广东社会科学,2017(5):176-185.
[6]朱恒鹏,彭晓博.医疗价格形成机制和医疗保险支付方式的历史演变——国际比较及对中国的启示[J].国际经济评论,2018(1):24-38.
[7]顾雪非,刘小青.从数量到价值:医保支付如何驱动医疗卫生体系整合[J].卫生经济研究,2020,37(1):7-10.
[8]顾昕,惠文,沈永东.社会治理与医保支付改革:理论分析与国际经验[J].保险研究,2022(2):99-115.
[9]金春林,王海银,孙辉,等.价值医疗的概念、实践及其实现路径[J].卫生经济研究,2019,36(2):6-8.
[10] CMS. CMS hospital value-based purchasing program results for fiscal year 2020[R]. Centers For Medicare and Medicaid Services,2021.
[11]祖恩晴,鲁冰,王贤吉,等.美国医疗保险和医疗救助服务中心基于价值医疗的医院绩效评价与战略购买的经验与启示[J].中国卫生资源,2023,26(5):477-482.
[12]申鑫,韩春艳,甘勇,等.基于DRG的医疗服务绩效评价体系构建研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2020,13(3):77-82.
[13]马超,俞沁雯,宋泽,等.长期护理保险、医疗费用控制与价值医疗[J].中国工业经济,2019(12):42-59.
[14]刘宏,段雪怡,王天宇.价值医疗视角下的医保门诊共济保障与居民健康[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):134-148.
[15] RICH M W, FREEDLAND K E. Effect of DRGs on three-month readmission rate of geriatric patients with congestive heart failure[J]. American journal of public health,1988,78(6):680-682.
[16]朱凤梅.DRG/DIP支付改革、费用控制与影响机制——基于19个地区抽样数据的多期双重差分分析[J].社会保障评论,2023,7(5):54-67.
[17]王坚强,王奕婷.DRG医保支付方式改革对医疗行为的影响[J].湖南社会科学,2021(1):133-139.
[18]潘春燕.DRG支付方式的实践探讨——以JH市试点情况为例[J].卫生经济研究,2019,36(8):38-41.
[19]廖藏宜,蓝志成.柳州DRG—点数法的政策机制、改革效果与核心经验[J].中国医疗保险,2020(9):18-22.
[20]李玉婷,李江凤,黄华峰,等.六盘水市DRG付费方式改革的探索与实践[J].中国医疗保险,2020(9):52-55.
[21]苏岱,李浩森,陈迎春,等.三明市公立医疗机构支付方式改革效果评价[J].中华医疗机构管理杂志,2017,33(4):271-274.
[22]胡广宇,刘立煌,吴世超,等.基于间断时间序列分析的DRG-PPS改革效果研究[J].中国卫生政策研究,2019,12(10):23-28.
[23] UWE K H, DAVID S K. Policy trends and reforms in the German DRG-based hospital payment system[J]. Health policy,2015,119(3):252-257.
[24] MIHAILOVIC N, KOCIC S, JAKOVLJEVIC M. Review of diagnosis-related group-based financing of hospital care[J]. Health services research and managerial epidemiology,2016,3(5):1-8.
[25] ZEYNEP O. Implementation of DRG payment in France:issues and recent developments[J]. Health policy,2014,117(2):146-150.
[26]林敏,夏燕,朱婷,等.DRG付费改革对医疗机构运营效率的影响研究[J].卫生经济研究,2021,38(12):62-65.
[27]张静秋,江芹,郎婧婧,等.DRG付费改革的医疗机构实施效果对照研究[J].中国卫生经济,2021,40(7):44-47.
[28] ZHANG J. The impact of a diagnosis-related group-based prospective payment experiment:the experience of Shanghai[J]. Applied economics letters,2010,17(18):1797-1803.
[29] WAGNER A K,SOUMERAI S B,ZHANG F, et al. Segmented regression analysis of interrupted time series studies in medication use research[J]. Journal of clinical pharmacy and therapeutics,2002,27(4):299-309.
[30] FRETHEIM A,ZHANG F,ROSS-DEGNAN D, et al.A reanalysis of cluster randomized trials showed interrupted time-series studies were valuable in health system evaluation[J]. Journal of clinical epidemiology,2015,68(3):324-333.
[31] TALJAARD M, MCKENZIE J E, RAMSAY C R, et al. The use of segmented regression in analysing interrupted time series studies:an example in pre-hospital ambulance care[J]. Implementation science,2014,9(1):1-4.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2024.11.007
中图分类号:R197.1;F842.684
引用信息:
[1]廖藏宜,荆欧杰,惠文.医保DRG付费改革对医疗服务价值的促进作用——来自H市的证据[J].财经问题研究,2024,No.492(11):89-103.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2024.11.007.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“医保DRG付费的基金监管效果评价及政策优化研究”(24BGL277); 国家自然科学基金青年项目“价值医保视域下DRG付费改革的效果评价及政策优化研究”(72004235)
2024-11-04
2024-11-04