| 958 | 19 | 665 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
党的二十大报告指出,实现全体人民共同富裕是中国式现代化的本质要求。在中国式现代化背景下,中国企业管理应基于利益相关者视角,响应共同富裕的目标导向,积极履行社会责任和道德责任。利益相关者理论将企业管理的关注点和企业创造财富的动力由股东、企业内部转向社会整体的主张,符合中华文明传统的一贯精神,更有助于实现共同富裕,也更能彰显中国式现代化的特质和优势。企业应秉持一种“共生共在”的理念,深刻认识到自身所承担的社会责任和道德责任,主动将自身的生存和发展融入实现共同富裕的过程之中。
Abstract:The report to the 20th National Congress of the Communist Party of China(CPC) systematically discussed the proposition of “Chinese modernization” and profoundly expounded its characteristics, essential requirements and major principles. Chinese modernization refers to common prosperity for all the people, and common prosperity is an important feature of the socialist market economy surpassing the capitalist market economy. In the context of socialism with Chinese characteristics, we must consider what role enterprises play in the socialist market economy.This paper argues that as the main body of economic activities, and as an important force in creating wealth and promoting social development, enterprises should take important moral and social responsibilities in the process of achieving common prosperity.Against the background of Chinese modernization, the article focuses on corporate responsibility oriented to the common prosperity from five perspectives. Firstly, the authors analyze the internal logic of the Chinese modernization of common prosperity that is superior to the Western capitalist modernization. Secondly, the article points out that the realization of common prosperity for all requires Chinese enterprises to uphold a stakeholder perspective and take social responsibility. The article introduces the development of the stakeholder perspective and emphasizes that the stakeholder perspective is a holistic, processual and relational perspective for understanding the nature of business. Thirdly, from a stakeholder perspective, it is argued that enterprises should be socially and ethically responsible, not just in terms of their own interests. Fourthly, the stakeholder perspective is in line with the traditional Chinese philosophy of coexistence, which not only helps to achieve common prosperity, but also can truly solve problems of wealth gap and inequality worldwide.Finally, the article suggests that Chinese enterprises should take care of their stakeholders based on the philosophy of“coexistence” and truly realize their value in the consideration of the overall progress of society. In addition, the article puts forward suggestions on how enterprises take social and moral responsibilities to help achieve common prosperity.The article is innovative in the following aspects. First, it explores research of promoting common prosperity from the perspective of stakeholders, which further supports the internal logic that Chinese modernization is superior to Western capitalist modernization. Second, it is argued that the stakeholder perspective is in line with the traditional spirit of“coexistence” of Chinese civilization, and it is also more capable of demonstrating the characteristics and advantages of Chinese modernization. Third, it is argued that against the background of Chinese modernization, the purpose of Chinese enterprises to create wealth should fundamentally for the common prosperity of all people and the overall prosperity of society, rather than for interests of shareholders and the development of enterprises.
[1]习近平.高举中国特色社会主义伟大旗帜为全面建设社会主义现代化国家而团结奋斗[N].人民日报,2022-10-26(1).
[2] COSTANZA R,HART M,POSNER S,et al. Beyond GDP:the need for new measures of progress[R].The Pradee Papers No.4,2009.
[3]托马斯·皮凯蒂. 21世纪资本论[M].巴曙松,陈剑,余江,等译.北京:中信出版社,2014:300.
[4]朱安东.西方国家的贫富分化问题及其对我国的启示[J].思想理论教育导刊,2016(3):79-84.
[5]美国贫富差距持续扩大,基尼系数创新高[EB/OL].(2022-09-14)[2023-03-02].http://cn.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202209/14/WS63218e62a310817f312edffb.html.
[6]马克思,恩格斯.马克思恩格斯全集:第4卷[M].中共中央马克思恩格斯列宁斯大林著作编译局,译.北京:人民出版社,1958:155.
[7] JENSEN M C,MECKLING W H. Theory of the firm:managerial behavior,agency costs and ownership structure[J].Journal of finance economics,1976,3(4):305-360.
[8] FRIEDMAN M. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits[J].The New York times magazine,1970(13):122-126.
[9] R·爱德华·弗里曼.战略管理:利益相关者方法[M].王彦华,梁豪,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2006:30.
[10] SIMON H A.Administrative behavior:a study of decision-making processes in administrative organizations[M]. 4th ed. New York:Free Press,1997:141.
[11]切斯特I.巴纳德.经理人员的职能[M].王永贵,译.北京:机械工业出版社,2017:198-204.
[12] CLARKSON M. A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance[J].Academy of management review, 1995,20(1):92-117.
[13]阿奇B.卡罗尔,安K.巴克霍尔茨.企业与社会:伦理与利益相关者管理[M].黄煜平,等译.北京:机械工业出版社,2004:51.
[14] BARNEY J B.Why resource based theory’s model of profit appropriation must in corporate a stakeholder perspective[J].Strategic management journal,2018,39(13):3305-3325.
[15] SAVAGE G T,NIX T W,WHITEHEAD C J,et al. Strategies for assessing and managing organizational stakeholders[J].Academy of management executives,1991,5(2):61-76.
[16] ROMAN R M,HAYIBOR S,AGLE B R. The relationship between social and financial performance:repainting a portrait[J].Business and society,1999,38(1):109-125.
[17]克劳斯·施瓦布,彼得·万哈姆.利益相关者[M].思齐,李艳,译.北京:中信出版社,2021:211-248.
[18]爱德华·弗里曼,杰弗里·哈里森,安德鲁·威克斯,等.利益相关者理论现状与展望[M].盛亚,李靖华,等译.北京:知识产权出版社,2013.
[19]杰西·诺曼.亚当·斯密传:现代经济学之父的思想[M].李烨,译.北京:中信出版集团,2021:315.
[20]亚当·斯密.道德情操论[M].郭大力,王亚南,译.北京:商务印书馆,2017:75.
[21] AMARTYA S. Does business ethics make economic sense?[J].Business ethics quarterly,1993,3(1):45-54.
[22] AMARTYA S. Rational fools:a critique of the behavioral foundations of economic theory[J]. Philosophy and public affairs,1977,6(4):317-344.
[23]乔治·恩德勒,杨朝朝.企业社会责任:我们认识多少[J].现代商业,2010(28):34-39.
[24]彼得·德鲁克.管理:任务、责任和实践:第1部[M].余向华,陈雪娟,张正平,译.北京:华夏出版社,2008:68.
[25]松下幸之助.经营者365金言:松下经营体验哲学的精华[M].潘祖铭,译.北京:军事译文出版社,1987:17.
[26] MULLIGAN T M.The moral mission of business[C]//BEAUCHAMP T, BOWIE N E. Ethical theory and business.4th ed. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice Hall,1993:66.
[27] GHOSHAL S. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices[J].Academy of management learning&education,2005,4(1):75-91.
[28]王立胜.在塑造人类文明新形态的进程中推进共同富裕[J].江西社会科学,2022(6):5-13.
[29]赵汀阳.共在存在论:人际与心际[J].哲学研究,2009(8):22-30.
[30]张康之.论人的互惠互利、相互依存与共生共在[J].天津社会科学,2019(4):55-63.
[31]习近平.在企业家座谈会上的讲话[N].人民日报,2020-07-21(2).
[32]刘鹤主持召开国务院促进中小企业发展工作领导小组第一次会议[EB/OL].(2018-08-20)[2023-03-02].http://www.gov.cn/guowuyuan/2018-08/20/content_5315204.htm.
[33]蔡昉.共同富裕三途[J].中国经济评论,2021(9):14-16.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2023.07.009
中图分类号:F270;F279.2
引用信息:
[1]原理,赵向阳.面向中国式现代化:以共同富裕为导向的企业责任[J].财经问题研究,2023,No.476(07):104-115.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2023.07.009.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“当代中国应用伦理学学科体系、学术体系、话语体系建设研究”(22&ZD042); 中国人民大学科学研究基金(中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金资助)项目“先秦儒家贤人治国思想研究”(20XNQ044);中国人民大学国家治理现代化平台与应用伦理跨学科重大规划创新平台项目