| 142 | 0 | 692 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
产业共生是推动线性（型）经济向循环经济转型、实现可持续发展的重要环节。本文从生态系统的整体观和动态观出发，采用双案例研究方法和溯因推理方法，对中国历史沿袭下来的“桑基鱼塘”模式与当前实践中涌现的“渔光一体”模式进行共性比较，揭示复合产业生态系统如何实现耦合共生和过程闭合。研究发现，复合产业生态系统需要在多个生产体系或生产环节间形成耦合共生的架构与运行机制，以打造循环型生态经济系统。生克关系交织是复合产业生态系统不断发展的内在条件。看似相互制约（相克）的两大产业，实则能在促进（相生）关系中为对方赋能，推动系统发生质变。复合产业生态系统中的不同产业子生态既以各自的子循环独立运行，又通过“8”字形连接为大循环。本文利用对立统一的辩证关系原理阐释了复合产业生态系统以“8”字形轨迹运行的理论机制，把中国智慧深植于循环型生态经济研究中，在中观层面上为可持续发展战略的落地实施提供坚实理论支撑。
Abstract：Industrial symbiosis serves as a pivotal step in transitioning from a linear economy to a circular economy and achieving sustainable development. Analyzing the architecture and operational mechanisms of the composite industrial ecosystem formed among multiple sectors holds significant theoretical and practical value. Drawing from the holistic and dynamic perspectives of traditional Chinese philosophy, this study employs an inductive paired-case study methodology and abductive logic of reasoning. Following theoretical sampling principles, it selects two emblematic models—the historically classic “mulberry-dyke-fishpond” model and the contemporary “fishery-photovoltaic integration” model—for comparative analysis. Through identifying commonalities in diversities, it elucidates how composite industrial ecosystems achieve coupling among system elements and the corresponding process mechanisms under the interwoven Sheng(mutual promotion) and Ke(mutual restraint) relationships.The findings are as follows. First, composite industrial ecosystems can establish architectures and operational mechanisms characterized by both positive and negative coupling between two or more industries, thereby constructing circular ecological economic systems. Both the “mulberry-dyke-fishpond” and “fishery-photovoltaic integration” models embody multidimensional interactive relations that are simultaneously Sheng and Ke. The interplay of the relationships constitutes the internal condition for the continuous evolution of composite industrial ecosystems. Second, the mutually restraining industries can empower their counterparts through the mutually promoting relations, resulting in a qualitative change of composite industrial ecosystems. Through the interwoven Sheng-Ke dynamics, industries can drive qualitative changes in specific system elements during particular developmental phases. The “fishery-photovoltaic integration” models validate the “three Sheng and one Ke” relational configuration inherent in the “mulberry-dyke-fishpond” model. Third, sub-ecosystems within a composite industrial ecosystem operate autonomously through their respective internal cycles while simultaneously interconnecting into a macro-cycle via an “8-shape” trajectory.The theoretical contributions of this study are threefold. First, through paired-case analysis, it clarifies the process mechanism by which composite industrial ecosystems achieve material closure in cycling, addressing a theoretical gap in industrial symbiosis research regarding circular attributes and their realization logic. Second, it reveals the architectural foundations and endogenous drivers that enable the perpetual regeneration(endless Sheng) of composite industrial ecosystems. Third, by introducing a “relation-process” explanatory paradigm distinct from substantialist ontologies, it embeds Chinese wisdom into circular ecological economic research.
[1]MOORE J F. Predators and prey:a new ecology of competition[J]. Harvard business review,1993,71(3):75-86.
[2]FROSCH R A, GALLOPOULOS N E. Strategies for manufacturing[J]. Scientific American,1989,261(3):144-152.
[3]刘刚，张泠然，殷建瓴.价值主张、价值创造、价值共享与农业产业生态系统的动态演进——基于德青源的案例研究[J].中国农村经济，2020(7):24-39.
[4]李慧明，左晓利.源于“循环”高于“循环”的循环经济深入发展研究[J].中国地质大学学报（社会科学版），2008(1):15-20.
[5]ABREU M C S, CEGLIA D. On the implementation of a circular economy:the role of institutional capacity-building through industrial symbiosis[J]. Resources, conservation and recycling,2018,138(11):99-109.
[6]SAAVEDRA Y M B, IRITANI D R, PAVAN A L R, et al. Theoretical contribution of industrial ecology to circular economy[J]. Journal of cleaner production,2018,170(1):1514-1522.
[7]CORVELLEC H, STOWELL A F, JOHANSSON N. Critiques of the circular economy[J]. Journal of industrial ecology,2021,26(3):421-432.
[8]MCDOWALL W, GENG Y, HUANG B, et al. Circular economy policies in China and Europe[J]. Journal of industrial ecology,2017,21(1):651-661.
[9]史巧玉.产业生态化研究进展及其引申[J].经济问题，2013(10):9-14.
[10]周纪昌.生态经济范式：特征、理论核心和成果[J].理论月刊，2012(6):112-116.
[11]诸大建.最近10年国外循环经济进展及对中国深化发展的启示[J].中国人口·资源与环境，2017,27(8):9-16.
[12]MERLI R,PREZIOSI M,ACAMPORA A. How do scholars approach the circular economy?A systematic literature review[J]. Journal of cleaner production,2018,178(3):703-722.
[13]孙丽文，任相伟，邢丽云.产业生态系统构建与中国经济高质量发展——基于高新技术产业与传统产业群落互动演化视角[J].当代经济管理，2020,42(4):40-48.
[14]李文军，郑艳玲，张芳，等.循环经济产业链构造与协同效应[J].国土资源科技管理，2024,41(3):80-88.
[15]舒辉，胡毅.农业物流生态圈协同发展机制及路径——基于江西淘鑫的单案例分析[J].南开管理评论，2021,24(4):16-28.
[16]FREI R,JACK L,KRZYZANIAK S A. Sustainable reverse supply chains and circular economy in multichannel retail returns[J]. Business strategy and the environment, 2020,29(5):1925-1940.
[17]范建平，李景峰，梁嘉骅，等.基于企业生态系统协同演化的管理研究[J].经济管理，2009,31(6):168-172.
[18]胡长生.环境治理的系统性思维论[J].湖北经济学院学报，2018,16(5):89-94.
[19]李慧明，左晓利.破解“生态”隐喻的困境——基于环境禀赋的产业生态化研究[J].中国科技论坛，2009(3):50-56.
[20]王如松.循环经济的生态误区和整合途径[J].中国特色社会主义研究，2005(5):29-34.
[21]俞国方，娄美珍.回顾与前瞻：产业生态系统理论研究[J].四川大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2008(3):92-100.
[22]ORTON J D, WEICK K E. Loosely coupled systems:a reconceptualization[J]. Academy of management review,1990,15(2):203-223.
[23]周超，杜健，孙聪.松散耦合理论在组织领域的应用：回顾与展望[J].外国经济与管理，2025,47(8):68-85.
[24]徐海英，周潮.全球生产网络（GPNs）与区域发展的动态战略耦合——苏南与苏北韩资汽车行业企业价值捕获轨迹的比较[J].人文地理，2019,34(4):89-96.
[25]杨旭，孟凡坤.黄河流域生态协同治理视域下国家自主性的嵌入与调适[J].青海社会科学，2022(5):53-62.
[26]GRAEDEL T E, ALLENBY B R. Industrial ecology[M]. Englewood Cliffs:Prentice Hall,1995:11-14.
[27]王如松.从农业文明到生态文明──转型期农村可持续发展的生态学方法[J].人文杂志，1999(6):53-59.
[28]邓伟根，陈林.产业生态学的一种经济学解释[J].经济评论，2006(6):74-79.
[29]GENG Y, COTE R. Diversity in industrial ecosystems[J]. International journal of sustainable development and world ecology,2007,14(4):329-335.
[30]曹海霞.资源型区域产业生态系统的演化与治理[J].经济问题，2018(12):88-93.
[31]赵欣，谷国锋，刘艳.民族地区生态效率时空演化特征及影响因素研究——以内蒙古自治区为例[J].黑龙江民族丛刊，2023(6):64-72.
[32]苗泽华，陈永辉.京津冀区域复合生态系统的共生机制[J].河北大学学报（哲学社会科学版），2016,41(5):79-84.
[33]GEHMAN J, GLASER V, EISENHARDT K,et al. Finding theory-method fit:a comparison of three qualitative approaches to theory building[J]. Journal of management inquiry,2018,27(3):284-300.
[34]刘子晴.光伏电站与生态产业互补发展研究[J].光源与照明，2023(10):118-120.
[35]钟功甫.珠江三角洲的“桑基鱼塘”——一个水陆相互作用的人工生态系统[J].地理学报，1980(3):200-209+277-278.
[36]叶显恩，周兆晴.桑基鱼塘，生态农业的典范[J].珠江经济，2008(7):91-96.
[37]叶明儿.湖州桑基鱼塘系统与儒家生态伦理思想[J].遗产与保护研究，2016,1(4):37-42.
[38]王洪波.从实体性到关系性：思维方法之互补或超越——以个体与整体的关系为例[J].南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版），2016,47(2):28-32.
[39]王凤彬，郑腾豪，刘刚.企业组织变革的动态演化过程——基于海尔和IBM纵向案例的生克化制机理的探讨[J].中国工业经济，2018(6):174-192.
[40]耿路，杨景旭，王欣怡.渔光互补产业模式发展研究[J].经济研究导刊，2023(24):28-30.
[41]郑廷裕，丘雨晨，雷美容.宁德打造“风、光、储、充、用”微电网示范项目清洁能源续能“海上田园”[J].中国电力企业管理，2023(25):43-45.
[42]张家华，刘兴国，顾兆俊，等.渔光互补生态经济特征及其发展方向[J].水产学报，2022,46(8):1525-1535.
[43]王凤彬，郭奕锴，王晖.企业境内外双循环的动态复合过程机理[J].研究与发展管理，2024,36(5):1-14.
(1)根据各要素在循环中所扮演的不同角色，以及其在循环中所发挥作用的不同性质来判定生者、中介者、成者、催化者。以{ABCD}子循环为例，要素A为生者，要素B为中介者，要素C为成者，要素D为催化者。
基本信息:
DOI：10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.03.008
中图分类号:F326;F426.61
引用信息:
[1]郑珊珊,李彬.复合产业生态系统的架构与运行机制研究——循环型生态经济的案例分析[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.508(03):104-117.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.03.008.
基金信息:
国家自然科学基金重点项目“文旅深度融合发展的游客体验管理研究”（72332010）
2026-03-05
2026-03-05