| 67 | 0 | 130 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在全球气候治理加速推进与中国“双碳”战略纵深推进的背景下,迅猛发展的数字服务贸易尤其是数字服务进口贸易为制造业绿色转型提供了重要的契机和助力。本文基于增加值视角,以2012—2021年EORA26全球供应链数据库中中国与其他国家双边贸易进出口总额排名前90位国家为样本,采用其投入产出及环境卫星账户数据,测算中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平,并采用双向固定效应模型实证检验数字服务进口贸易对中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平的影响及作用机制。研究发现:数字服务进口贸易能够提升中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平,且该结论在经过内生性检验和稳健性检验后仍然成立;数字服务进口贸易通过提高技术创新能力、人力资本密度和环境规制强度提升中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平;产业结构调整能够正向调节数字服务进口贸易对中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平的提升作用;数字服务进口贸易对中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平的提升作用在低技术行业,计算机与信息服务、商业、电信服务,其他商业服务,个人文化和娱乐服务中显著。本文研究对进一步探讨数字服务进口贸易的绿色发展效应具有重要参考意义。
Abstract:Driven by global climate governance and China's “dual-carbon” strategy, the green and low-carbon transformation of the manufacturing industry has become a crucial aspect of high-quality development. Digital service imports, with their inherent technology spillover and factor allocation functions, provide new opportunities for restructuring the green value chain in manufacturing. However, existing research on measuring green global value chains remains underdeveloped, and the theoretical linkage and empirical evidence between digital service imports and the green value chain in manufacturing require further exploration. This paper systematically examines the impact, mechanisms, and heterogeneity of digital service import trade on the green value chain level of China's manufacturing industry.Based on the EORA26 database, this study selects input-output data and environmental satellite accounts from China and 90 major trading partners from 2012 to 2021, constructing a green value chain accounting framework from a value-added perspective. A two-way fixed effects model is applied for baseline regression, with instrumental variable estimation and alternative core variable methods used for endogeneity and robustness tests. The empirical findings are as follows. First, digital service import trade significantly enhances the green value chain level of China's manufacturing industry, a conclusion that remains valid after endogeneity and robustness tests. Second, mechanism analyses reveal that technological innovation, human capital accumulation, and environmental regulation intensity serve as key transmission pathways, with all three playing significant mediating roles. Third, industrial structure adjustment exerts a positive moderating effect on the relationship between digital service imports and the green value chain in manufacturing. Fourth, heterogeneity analyses indicate that the impact of digital service import trade varies significantly across manufacturing industries with different technology intensities, as well as across different digital service sectors.Compared with existing studies, the marginal contributions of this study are as follows. First, it employs the import penetration rate of services to measure the impact of digital service imports on China's manufacturing industry, offering greater credibility than using aggregate trade data alone. Second, it provides an in-depth theoretical analysis and empirically examines the mediating roles of technological innovation, human capital, and environmental regulation. Third, considering data timeliness and the need to measure embodied carbon emissions in China's export trade, this study innovatively utilizes the EORA26 database, which includes environmental satellite accounts across 90 countries, to decompose China's domestic value added in manufacturing exports from a value-added perspective. The findings reveal the underlying logic between digital service imports and the green value chain in manufacturing. The government should implement differentiated policy support continuously expand the opening up of digital service imports.
[1]沈静,曹媛媛.全球价值链绿色化的概念性认知及其研究框架[J].地理科学进展,2019,38(10):1462-1472.
[2]刘尧飞,沈杰.双循环格局下的供应链价值链绿色化转型研究[J].青海社会科学,2020(6):47-53.
[3]JEPPESEN S, HANSEN M W. Environmental upgrading of third world enterprises through linkages to transnational corporations:theoretical perspectives and preliminary evidence[J]. Business strategy and the environment, 2004,13(4):261-274.
[4]GLACHANT M, DUSSAUX D, MÉNIÈRE Y. Greening global value chains:innovation and the international diffusion of technologies and knowledge[R]. World Bank Policy Researh Working Paper No.6467,2013.
[5]武力超,陈凤兰,李嘉欣.制造业投入服务化与企业全球绿色价值链分工地位[J].国际经贸探索,2023,39(6):52-66.
[6]刘瑞喜,韩剑,张庆勇.环境规则治理与全球绿色价值链[J].经济科学,2024(3):23-41.
[7]陈诗一,许璐.“双碳”目标下全球绿色价值链发展的路径研究[J].北京大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2022,59(2):5-12.
[8]景守武,周泽嘉,扈超浩,等.数字服务贸易进口促进出口产品质量提升了吗?——基于创新能力与工业化水平双重视角的检验[J].技术经济,2025,44(9):47-61.
[9]方慧,霍启欣,李泽鑫.数字服务进口贸易对企业创新质量的影响研究[J].上海财经大学学报,2022,24(6):78-92.
[10]周丽萍.数字贸易进口与企业间工资均等化[J].当代财经,2021(11):101-111.
[11]陈治,郝爽.数字服务进口贸易与东道国经济增长——基于跨境数据要素流入视角[J].统计研究,2025,42(3):103-116.
[12]姜峰,段云鹏.数字“一带一路”能否推动中国贸易地位提升——基于进口依存度、技术附加值、全球价值链位置的视角[J].国际商务(对外经济贸易大学学报),2021(2):77-93.
[13]吴友群,卢怀鑫,王立勇.制造业数字化投入对全球价值链分工的影响——基于制造业行业的实证分析[J].中国科技论坛,2022(9):85-94+117.
[14]万伦来,朱琴.R&D投入对工业绿色全要素生产率增长的影响——来自中国工业1999~2010年的经验数据[J].经济学动态,2013(9):20-26.
[15]王柯丹,刘颖,汪寿阳.数据要素与绿色创新:基于新质生产力视角[J].财经问题研究,2024(9):18-33.
[16]张红霞,李家琦,张哲.数字贸易开放与全球绿色贸易发展——基于制造业环境产品双边贸易视角的分析[J].国际贸易问题,2025(6):137-155.
[17]韩峰,王涵.数字化转型、劳动力市场整合与制造业全球价值链攀升[J].宏观经济研究,2024(7):4-27+71.
[18]程锐,马莉莉.高级人力资本扩张与制造业出口产品质量升级[J].国际贸易问题,2020(8):36-51.
[19]杨烨,谢建国.城市环境规制对中国企业全球价值链地位的影响研究[J].国际贸易问题,2025(4):74-90.
[20]姜苗苗,杨来科.数字产品进口、吸收能力与制造业企业污染排放——“杰文斯悖论”再检验与破解路径探索[J].兰州学刊,2025(1):74-94.
[21]XU Z, LI X, DENG H,et al. Digital global value chain transformation and carbon emissions embodied in exports:evidence from the greening of trade in China’s manufacturing industry[J]. Journal of cleaner production,2025,536(C):147175.
[22]钟成林,张迁,贾俊松.数字经济对城市群工业低碳协同的赋能与治理[J].财经问题研究,2024(7):88-101.
[23]陈明,魏作磊.服务业开放打破中国制造业“低端锁定”了吗[J].经济学家,2018(2):70-79.
[24]蒋波,周立新,黄应绘.中国工业高质量发展的测度、区域差异及收敛性[J].经济地理,2026,46(2):15-24.
[25]詹淼华,徐志远,徐亮.创新行为与中国制造业出口竞争力的持续时间[J].中国科技论坛,2022(4):37-46.
[26]张成,陆旸,郭路,等.环境规制强度和生产技术进步[J].经济研究,2011,46(2):113-124.
[27]王正新,李丹丹.中国普惠金融对产业结构的非线性影响:基于PSTR的实证分析[J].中国管理科学,2022,30(8):69-81.
[28]王领,许怡.区域贸易协定深度对中国参与全球价值链的影响[J].重庆工商大学学报(社会科学版),2022,39(3):164-176.
[29]江艇.因果推断经验研究中的中介效应与调节效应[J].中国工业经济,2022(5):100-120.
(1)文中90个国家的名称、制造业行业分类情况未在正文中列出,留存备索。
(1)稳健性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.009
中图分类号:X322;F752.68;F752.61;F424
引用信息:
[1]邱爱莲,尹馨梓.数字服务进口贸易提升中国制造业绿色全球价值链水平了吗[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.509(04):118-129.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.009.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“数字服务贸易对我国制造业绿色转型的影响机制与推进策略研究”(22BJY015)
2026-04-05
2026-04-05