nav emailalert searchbtn searchbox tablepage yinyongbenwen piczone journalimg journalInfo journalinfonormal searchdiv searchzone qikanlogo popupnotification paper paperNew
2026, 02, No.507 89-103
数字化转型如何影响企业成本粘性
基金项目(Foundation): 国家社会科学基金一般项目“国有资本投资运营公司经济行政型治理模式研究”(21BGL110); 辽宁省哲学社会科学重点学科建设项目“国有资本投资运营公司治理现代化研究”(L23ZD017); 辽宁省教育厅重点攻关项目“加快辽宁国有经济布局优化和结构调整研究”(JYTZD2023066)
邮箱(Email):
DOI: 10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.007
摘要:

在数字经济时代,从成本管理视角探讨数字化转型的价值创造作用,对企业优化资源配置、实现高质量发展具有重要意义。本文以2010—2023年中国A股上市公司为样本,实证检验了数字化转型对企业成本粘性的影响及作用机制。研究发现,数字化转型能够抑制企业成本粘性,该结论在经过一系列内生性检验和稳健性检验后仍然成立。数字化转型通过降低企业资源调整成本和纠正管理者乐观预期抑制企业成本粘性。数字化转型对企业成本粘性的抑制作用在高能力管理者企业、非国有企业、低信息透明度企业、高行业竞争度企业中更显著。同时,数字化转型对非劳动力成本粘性的抑制作用显著。此外,数字化转型对企业成本粘性的抑制作用有助于企业当期及未来价值的提升,具有长期价值创造作用。本文研究丰富了数字化转型的价值创造研究,为企业数字化转型提供了启示。

Abstract:

In recent years, with the rapid development of the digital economy and the increasingly complex and volatile market landscape, the issue of value creation through digital transformation has become a topic of widespread concern in both practical and academic circles. Cost management is a critical aspect of enterprise operations, closely linked to resource allocation efficiency and value creation capabilities, with cost stickiness being a key manifestation of cost management behavior. Existing literature has explored the influencing factors of cost stickiness from macro-level institutional environments, meso-level industry characteristics, and micro-level enterprise perspectives, yet few studies have examined how digital transformation, a significant strategic change, affects cost stickiness.Based on this, this paper investigates the value creation mechanism of digital transformation from the perspective of cost stickiness, using data from Chinese A-share listed companies from 2010 to 2023. The findings reveal that digital transformation can effectively mitigate enterprise cost stickiness. Mechanism tests indicate that digital transformation achieves this by reducing resource adjustment costs and correcting managerial optimism. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the inhibitory effect of digital transformation on enterprises cost stickiness is more pronounced in enterprises with higher managerial capabilities, non-state-owned enterprises, highly competitive industries, and enterprises with lower information transparency. Additionally, this inhibitory effect is not reflected in labor cost stickiness but is realized by reducing non-labor cost stickiness. Moreover, the suppression of cost stickiness through digital transformation ultimately enhances both current and future enterprise value, demonstrating a long-term value creation effect.This paper contributes to relevant literature in three key aspects. First, from the perspective of cost stickiness, it enriches research on the economic consequences of digital transformation. Existing studies on the value creation of digital transformation have primarily focused on its impact on operational efficiency, enterprise governance, and innovation, with limited attention to whether and how digital transformation affects cost management behavior. By examining cost stickiness, this paper expands research on value creation through digital transformation. Second, it reveals that reducing resource adjustment costs and correcting managerial optimism are important mechanisms through which digital transformation affects cost stickiness. Third, it broadens the research framework on the influencing factors of cost stickiness. By incorporating digital transformation, a crucial strategic shift in the digital economy era, into the analysis, this paper provides a new perspective for understanding cost stickiness and offers valuable insights for enterprises to optimize resource allocation and promote high-quality development.This paper elucidates the internal logic of how digital transformation influences enterprises cost management behavior. It provides empirical evidence for government regulators to create a targeted institutional environment conducive to enterprises digital transformation and offers significant implications for enterprises seeking to optimize cost management decisions and enhance resource allocation efficiency through digital transformation.

参考文献

[1]何帆,刘红霞.数字经济视角下实体企业数字化变革的业绩提升效应评估[J].改革,2019(4):137-148.

[2]李琦,刘力钢,邵剑兵.数字化转型、供应链集成与企业绩效——企业家精神的调节效应[J].经济管理,2021,43(10):5-23.

[3]TRUANT E, BROCCARDO L, DANA L. Digitalisation boosts company performance:an overview of Italian listed companies[J]. Technological forecasting and social change,2021,173:121173.

[4]罗进辉,巫奕龙.数字化运营水平与真实盈余管理[J].管理科学,2021,34(4):3-18.

[5]宋德勇,朱文博,丁海.企业数字化能否促进绿色技术创新?——基于重污染行业上市公司的考察[J].财经研究,2022,48(4):34-48.

[6]尹建华,高小慧.企业数字化转型与绿色创新关系:一项基于TOE框架的元分析[J].技术经济,2025,44(11):49-65.

[7]ANDERSON M C, BANKER R D, JANAKIRAMANJ S N. Are selling, general, and administrative costs“sticky”?[J]. Journal of accounting research,2003,41(1):47-63.

[8]BANKER R, BYZALOV D, CHEN L. Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior[J]. Journal of accounting and economics,2013,55(1):111-127.

[9]CHEN C X, LU H, SOUGIANNIS T. The agency problem, corporate governance, and the asymmetrical behavior of selling, general, and administrative costs[J]. Contemporary accounting research,2012,29(1):252-282.

[10]梁上坤.机构投资者持股会影响公司费用粘性吗?[J].管理世界,2018,34(12):133-148.

[11]刘媛媛,刘斌.劳动保护、成本粘性与企业应对[J].经济研究,2014,49(5):63-76.

[12]江伟,姚文韬,胡玉明.《最低工资规定》的实施与企业成本粘性[J].会计研究,2016(10):56-62+97.

[13]梁上坤.管理者过度自信、债务约束与成本粘性[J].南开管理评论,2015,18(3):122-131.

[14]全怡,陶聪.女性高管与企业费用粘性——基于管理层自利的视角[J].会计与经济研究,2018,32(5):40-58.

[15]洪荭,陈晓芳,胡华夏,等.产业政策与企业成本粘性——基于资源配置视角[J].会计研究,2021(1):112-131.

[16]全怡,严丽娜,刘磊.注册地变更与企业费用粘性——基于政策性优惠和负担的视角[J].会计研究,2019(8):47-54.

[17]谢露,翟胜宝,童丽静.博彩文化与企业费用粘性[J].会计研究,2021(5):121-132.

[18]李继元,汪方军,赵红升,等.“党建入章”与企业成本粘性:基于党组织治理的解释[J].外国经济与管理,2021,43(10):21-34.

[19]赵璨,曹伟,姚振晔,等.“互联网+”有利于降低企业成本粘性吗?[J].财经研究,2020,46(4):33-47.

[20]吕可夫,于明洋,阮永平.企业数字化转型与资源配置效率[J].科研管理,2023,44(8):11-20.

[21]祁怀锦,曹修琴,刘艳霞.数字经济对公司治理的影响——基于信息不对称和管理者非理性行为视角[J].改革,2020(4):50-64.

[22]罗珉,李亮宇.互联网时代的商业模式创新:价值创造视角[J].中国工业经济,2015(1):95-107.

[23]张叶青,陆瑶,李乐芸.大数据应用对中国企业市场价值的影响——来自中国上市公司年报文本分析的证据[J].经济研究,2021,56(12):42-59.

[24]MIKALEF P, PATELI A. Information technology-enabled dynamic capabilities and their indirect effect on competitive performance:findings from PLS-SEM and fsQCA[J]. Journal of business research,2017,70(1):1-16.

[25]赵振.“互联网+”跨界经营:创造性破坏视角[J].中国工业经济,2015(10):146-160.

[26]陈剑,黄朔,刘运辉.从赋能到使能——数字化环境下的企业运营管理[J].管理世界,2020,36(2):117-128+222.

[27]曾建光,王立彦,徐海乐.ERP系统的实施与代理成本——基于中国ERP导入期的证据[J].南开管理评论,2012,15(3):131-138.

[28]刘政,姚雨秀,张国胜,等.企业数字化、专用知识与组织授权[J].中国工业经济,2020(9):156-174.

[29]方巧玲,余怒涛,徐慧.数字化转型的治理效应研究:会计信息质量视角[J].会计研究,2024(3):34-50.

[30]谢素朴,潘彬.参与“一带一路”投资会影响企业成本粘性吗——基于中国上市公司经验数据[J].会计研究,2025(6):19-31.

[31]甄红线,王玺,方红星.知识产权行政保护与企业数字化转型[J].经济研究,2023,58(11):62-79.

[32]王竹泉,段丙蕾,王苑琢,等.资本错配、资产专用性与公司价值——基于营业活动重新分类的视角[J].中国工业经济,2017(3):120-138.

[33]李鹤尊,孙健,安娜.ERP系统实施与企业成本粘性[J].会计研究,2020(11):47-59.

[34]黄建烨,李玉婷,谭成雪.党组织参与治理能促进实体经济“脱虚向实”吗?——基于民营上市企业的实证研究[J].财经问题研究,2023(4):72-86.

[35]肖土盛,郭泽菁,耿春晓.企业数字化转型与关系型交易治理:来自关联交易的经验证据[J].经济理论与经济管理,2025,45(4):76-95.

[36]WEISS D. Cost behavior and analysts’ earnings forecasts[J]. The accounting review,2010,85(4):1441-1471.

[37]金星晔,左从江,方明月,等.企业数字化转型的测度难题:基于大语言模型的新方法与新发现[J].经济研究,2024,59(3):34-53.

[38]杨德明,刘泳文.“互联网+”为什么加出了业绩[J].中国工业经济,2018(5):80-98.

[39]许楠,刘浩,蔡伟成.独立董事人选、履职效率与津贴决定——资产专用性的视角[J].管理世界,2018,34(3):109-123+184.

[40]姚立杰,周颖.管理层能力、创新水平与创新效率[J].会计研究,2018(6):70-77.

[41]张铁铸,沙曼.管理层能力、权力与在职消费研究[J].南开管理评论,2014,17(5):63-72.

[42]DEMERJIAN P, LEV B, MCVAY S. Quantifying managerial ability:a new measure and validity tests[J].Management science,2012,58(7):1229-1248.

[43]杨兴全,尹兴强.国企混改如何影响公司现金持有?[J].管理世界,2018,34(11):93-107.

[44]魏志华,王孝华,蔡伟毅.税收征管数字化与企业内部薪酬差距[J].中国工业经济,2022(3):152-170.

[45]姜付秀,蔡文婧,蔡欣妮,等.银行竞争的微观效应:来自融资约束的经验证据[J].经济研究,2019,54(6):72-88.

[46]潘越,戴亦一,林超群.信息不透明、分析师关注与个股暴跌风险[J].金融研究,2011(9):138-151.

[47]肖土盛,孙瑞琦,袁淳,等.企业数字化转型、人力资本结构调整与劳动收入份额[J].管理世界,2022,38(12):220-237.

[48]陈磊,宋乐,施丹.企业的成本粘性被高估了吗?基于中国上市公司的实证研究[J].中国会计评论,2012,10(1):1-14.

(1)稳健性检验结果未在正文中列出,留存备索。

基本信息:

DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.007

中图分类号:F270.7;F275

引用信息:

[1]韩亮亮,李晓涵,彭伊.数字化转型如何影响企业成本粘性[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.507(02):89-103.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.02.007.

基金信息:

国家社会科学基金一般项目“国有资本投资运营公司经济行政型治理模式研究”(21BGL110); 辽宁省哲学社会科学重点学科建设项目“国有资本投资运营公司治理现代化研究”(L23ZD017); 辽宁省教育厅重点攻关项目“加快辽宁国有经济布局优化和结构调整研究”(JYTZD2023066)

发布时间:

2026-02-05

出版时间:

2026-02-05

检 索 高级检索