| 365 | 0 | 70 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
在建设现代化经济体系过程中,以高端制造为代表的高技术产业链具有举足轻重的作用。本文阐释了产业链自主可控的本质内涵,分析了中国高技术产业链自主可控发展的现实诉求与困境,梳理了主要发达国家打造高技术产业链的典型经验。主要研究结论有:第一,高技术产业链当前面临外循环遭受发达国家围堵、内循环基础能力欠缺、韧性和安全水平降低、“断链”风险加剧等问题,严重影响了中国构建国内大循环体系及产业链现代化进程;第二,主要发达国家通过产业链本地化战略与系统性贸易保护工具维护产业链竞争优势,通过供应链空间重构和制度化联盟合作双重路径提升产业链韧性,通过建立风险评估机制和强化外资审查应对产业链供应链风险,并通过主导国际规则制定和深化跨国科技合作强化产业链掌控力与技术领先地位;第三,提升中国高技术产业链自主可控水平需力争“控链”、加快“强链”、重视“稳链”、推动“优链”和突出“补链”,以此应对外部冲击和挑战,提升中国自主创新能力。
Abstract:High-tech industrial chains, represented by high-end manufacturing, play a pivotal role in constructing a modernized economic system. It has become increasingly urgent to systematically review the new circumstances facing the development of China's high-tech industrial chains, elucidate the primary approaches taken by major developed countries in building autonomous and controllable industrial chains, and analyze the practical challenges China encounters in advancing the autonomous and controllable development of its high-tech industrial chains.This paper finds that China's high-tech industrial chains currently face problems, such as encirclement and suppression by developed countries in the external circulation, a lack of foundational capabilities within the chain, decreasing resilience and security levels, and intensifying risks of chain breakdowns. These problems severely impact China's efforts to build a robust domestic circulation system and the modernization process of its industrial chains. Simultaneously, increased protectionism in some countries has limited the level of opening-up. Major developed countries generally employ industrial chain localization strategies and trade protection tools to systematically maintain their competitive advantage in industrial chains. They enhance industrial chain resilience through dual pathways of supply chain spatial restructuring and institutionalized alliance cooperation, establish risk assessment mechanisms and strengthen foreign investment screening to address industrial and supply chain risks, and dominate international rule-making and deepen transnational technological cooperation to reinforce their control over industrial chains and their technological hegemony.Compared to existing literature, this paper makes contributions in the following two aspects. First, it comprehensively considers the key influencing factors affecting the autonomous and controllable development of industrial chains and existing research on autonomy and controllability in industrial fields. Through theoretical logic and deductive reasoning, it attempts to construct a “five-tier progressive vertical layering” model, which is driven sequentially by standard rules, foundational capability control, value unit chain control, core technology support, and an innovation ecosystem. Second, this paper proposes that achieving autonomy and controllability in China's high-tech industrial chains requires preventing the risk of industrial chain relocation through higher-level opening-up, strengthening global supply chain network security by better addressing the risk of supply cuts in key sectors, enhancing the core technological innovation capability of industrial chains through digital and intelligent transformation, forging industrial chain resilience and robustness by advancing self-reliance and self-strengthening in science and technology, and improving the driving capacity of industrial chains by promoting the domestic economic circulation.
[1]倪红福,钟道诚,范子杰.中国产业链风险敞口的测度、结构及国际比较——基于生产链长度视角[J].管理世界,2024,40(4):1-26.
[2]徐康宁.世界之变、时代之变、历史之变的逻辑意蕴:一种经济学的分析视角[J].学海,2024(2):72-84+215.
[3]周文,张奕涵.中国式现代化与现代化产业体系[J].上海经济研究,2024(4):14-30.
[4]刘志彪.产业链现代化的产业经济学分析[J].经济学家,2019(12):5-13.
[5]盛朝迅.新发展格局下推动产业链供应链安全稳定发展的思路与策略[J].改革,2021(2):1-13.
[6]刘洪钟.霸权护持与超越——高科技产业全球价值链竞争的政治经济学[J].世界经济与政治,2023(2):128-154+159-160.
[7]李晓华.面向制造强国的现代化产业体系:特征与构成[J].经济纵横,2023(11):59-70.
[8]王志芳,张丹.中美战略竞争与中国推动亚洲经济一体化的路径——基于全球价值链的视角[J].东北亚论坛,2023,32(4):66-81+128.
[9]陶锋,王欣然,徐扬,等.数字化转型、产业链供应链韧性与企业生产率[J].中国工业经济,2023(5):118-136.
[10]黄群慧,倪红福.基于价值链理论的产业基础能力与产业链水平提升研究[J].经济体制改革,2020(5):11-21.
[11]GEREFFI G, HUMPHREY J, STURGEON T. The governance of global value chains[J]. Review of international political economy,2005,12(1):78-104.
[12]程思佳,于立宏,陈辰.纵向并购对高新技术企业技术创新的影响研究[J].科研管理,2024(2):145-154.
[13]赖秀萍,聂力兵,周青,等.关键核心技术对产业链衍生技术创新的影响[J].科学学研究,2024,42(12):2642-2655.
[14]吴晓波,张馨月,沈华杰.商业模式创新视角下我国半导体产业“突围”之路[J].管理世界,2021,37(3):123-136+9.
[15]李天柱,马佳,高皓天,等.创新生态系统演化情境下的关键核心技术突破[J].科研管理,2024(1):51-63.
[16]黄先海,王瀚迪,孙涌铭,等.数字技术与企业出口质量升级——来自专利文本机器学习的证据[J].数量经济技术经济研究,2023(12):69-89.
[17]黄群慧,倪红福.中国经济国内国际双循环的测度分析——兼论新发展格局的本质特征[J].管理世界,2021,37(2):40-55.
[18]冯刚,曹鹤鸣.构建新发展格局:我国经济现代化的路径选择[J].毛泽东邓小平理论研究,2023(6):1-10+107.
[19]刘志彪,孔令池.从分割走向整合:推进国内统一大市场建设的阻力与对策[J].中国工业经济,2010(8):20-36.
[20]张云,柏培文.数智化如何影响双循环参与度与收入差距——基于省级—行业层面数据[J].管理世界,2023,39(10):58-83.
[21]张杰.中美科技创新战略竞争驱动下的全球产业链演变格局与应对策略[J].世界经济与政治论坛,2022(4):1-21.
[22]黄群慧,李芳芳.中国式现代化语境下推进新型工业化的逻辑与路径[J].财贸经济,2024,45(1):28-38.
[23]王涵枫.国际经济秩序的周期性演进研究——基于国家形式与资本形态的逻辑[J].政治经济学评论,2023,14(5):196-224.
[24]GEREFFI G. International trade and industrial upgrading in the apparel commodity chain[J]. Journal of international economics,1999,48(1):37-70.
[25]SONI U, JAIN V, KUMAR S. Measuring supply chain resilience using a deterministic modeling approach[J].Computers&industrial engineering,2014,74(8):11-25.
[26]凌丹,刘悦,刘慧岭.国际经济秩序演化与中国制造业产业链重构研究[J].经济学家,2022(8):119-128.
[27]谢家智,何雯妤.现代产业链韧性评价及提升路径[J].统计与信息论坛,2024(2):15-28.
[28]阳镇.技术创新视角下现代化产业体系的再解构[J].财经问题研究,2024(4):45-56.
[29]陈国进,刘元月,丁赛杰,等.宏观尾部风险、生产网络与行业产出[J].管理世界,2024,40(2):28-52.
(1)高技术产业链具体为从高技术制造业到高技术服务业的全链条覆盖,既包括硬件制造、技术研发等核心环节,也涵盖配套服务、应用推广等延伸领域,共同构成高技术产业发展的完整生态。
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.12.003
中图分类号:F276.44
引用信息:
[1]张辽,赵明.高技术产业链自主可控的国际镜鉴与中国路径[J].财经问题研究,2025,No.505(12):30-44.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2025.12.003.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金一般项目“新发展格局下我国高技术产业链自主可控能力多维评价及提升路径研究”(22BTJ072); 浙江省高校重大人文社科攻关计划项目“浙江省数字贸易产业链脆弱性测度与韧性提升对策研究”(2023QN002)