| 838 | 0 | 157 |
| 下载次数 | 被引频次 | 阅读次数 |
未来产业以人工智能、量子科技、生物科技等前沿技术为驱动,是发展新质生产力、建设现代化产业体系的关键所在。针对传统产业组织理论难以阐释未来产业的产业组织特征,本文构建了技术创新范式—产业组织特征—政策治理逻辑的整合性分析框架。研究发现,未来产业的技术创新呈现颠覆性、组合式与开放式三种范式的递进耦合,颠覆性创新提供原始动力,组合式创新推动技术转化与价值增值,开放式创新则为要素流动与协同演化构建制度生态。同时,上述技术创新范式通过改变成本结构、重塑进入壁垒和转换竞争维度,驱动未来产业的产业组织特征发生深刻变革,表现为垄断与竞争并存的市场结构,数据、算法与生态叠加的进入壁垒,聚焦于标准争夺、生态锁定与防御性并购的竞争行为。基于上述技术创新范式和产业组织特征,未来产业的政策治理逻辑须从弥补市场失灵向使命导向型创新政策转型,在纠正跨期错配、规制“生态垄断”、完善数据治理、加强标准统筹四个维度精准发力,构建兼具竞争活力与战略安全的产业治理体系。
Abstract:Future industries represent a new direction in industrial development characterized by breakthroughs in frontier technologies, expansion into emerging application scenarios, and continuous evolution of industrial forms. As a new round of technological revolution and industrial transformation advances, future industries are increasingly recognized as a critical domain for promoting shifts in economic growth models, shaping national competitive advantages, and cultivating new quality productive forces. This study focuses on future industries, systematically analyzing their core issues, including technological innovation, industrial organization, and policy governance, aiming to reveal the intrinsic mechanisms and evolutionary logic underlying their development. This study primarily employs a combination of theoretical analysis and framework construction, building a comprehensive analytical system for future industries across three dimensions: technological breakthroughs, organizational restructuring, and governance adaptation.The findings indicate that the development of future industries is marked by pronounced frontier characteristics, uncertainty, and dynamic complexity, rendering traditional analysis frameworks based on mature industries insufficient to fully explain their formation mechanisms and evolutionary trajectories. From the perspective of technological innovation, the growth of future industries relies on a synergy of fundamental research breakthroughs, integration of key technologies, and collaborative innovation among multiple actors, reflecting a shift from isolated technological breakthroughs to systematic coordination. Regarding industrial organization, future industries exhibit core features such as the aggregation of key actors, strengthened platform support, and enhanced ecosystem collaboration. Consequently, market competition evolves from product-centric rivalry to comprehensive competition encompassing technologies, standards, platforms, and ecosystem capabilities. In terms of policy governance, the development of future industries requires not only a stable institutional environment and sustained innovation support but also a forward-looking, flexible, and systemic policy framework encompassing risk sharing, resource allocation, standard setting, and governance coordination.This study argues that future industries do not emerge solely through technological progress; rather, they expand and consolidate through the interplay of technological innovation, industrial organization evolution, and policy governance optimization. Looking ahead, coordinated efforts should focus on strengthening fundamental research, improving collaborative innovation mechanisms, optimizing industrial ecosystem configurations, and refining governance systems to enhance the quality and resilience of future industrial development. Overall, this paper provides a comprehensive perspective on the core logic of future industries, offering theoretical insights into understanding their formation mechanisms and informing effective policy design.
[1]代栓平,项子安.发挥政府市场治理功能培育和发展未来产业[J].工业技术经济,2024,43(12):14-20.
[2]沈华,王晓明,潘教峰.我国发展未来产业的机遇、挑战与对策建议[J].中国科学院院刊,2021,36(5):565-572.
[3]渠慎宁.未来产业发展的支持性政策及其取向选择[J].改革,2022(3):77-86.
[4]王小林,谢妮芸.未来产业:内涵特征、组织变革与生态建构[J].社会科学辑刊,2023(6):173-182.
[5]陈凯华,冯卓,康瑾,等.我国未来产业科技发展战略选择[J].中国科学院院刊,2023,38(10):1459-1467.
[6]云慧敏,陈必强,谭天伟.中国生物制造关键技术进展与未来趋势[J].科技导报,2025,43(23):24-32.
[7]CHRISTENSEN C, RAYNOR M. The innovator’s solution:creating and sustaining successful growth[M]. Boston:Harvard Business School Press,2003:22-36.
[8]AUERSWALD P, BRANSCOMB L. Valleys of death and Darwinian seas:financing the invention to innovation transition in the United States[J]. Journal of technology transfer,2003,28(3-4):227-239.
[9]ARTHUR W. The structure of invention[J]. Research policy,2002,31(8-9):1267-1281.
[10]BRANDENBURGER A, NALEBUFF B. The right game:use game theory to shape strategy[J]. Harvard business review,1995,73(4):57-71.
[11]BAUMOL W. On the proper cost tests for natural monopoly in a multiproduct industry[J]. The American economic review,1977,67(5):809-822.
[12]JACOBIDES M, CENNAMO C, GAWER A. Towards a theory of ecosystems[J]. Strategic management journal,2018,39(8):2255-2276.
[13]TIROLE J. The theory of industrial organization[M]. Boston:MIT Press,1988:65-87.
[14]DIERICKX I, COOL K. Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage[J]. Management science,1989,35(12):1504-1511.
[15]ARTHUR W. Increasing returns and the new world of business[J]. Harvard business review,1996,74(4):100-109.
[16]KOGUT B, ZANDER U. Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology[J].Organization science,1992,3(3):383-397.
[17]PORTER M. How competitive forces shape strategy[J]. Harvard business review,1979,57(2):137-145.
[18]MAZZUCATO M. Mission-oriented innovation policies:challenges and opportunities[J]. Industrial and corporate change,2018,27(5):803-815.
[19]KHAN L. Amazon’s antitrust paradox[J]. Yale law journal,2017,126(3):710-805.
[20]DAVID P. Clio and the economics of QWERTY[J]. The American economic review,1985,75(2):332-337.
基本信息:
DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.003
中图分类号:F124
引用信息:
[1]渠慎宁,沈梦檀.未来产业的技术创新范式、产业组织特征与政策治理逻辑[J].财经问题研究,2026,No.509(04):38-47.DOI:10.19654/j.cnki.cjwtyj.2026.04.003.
基金信息:
国家社会科学基金重大项目“数字经济推动产业链供应链现代化水平提升的机制与对策研究”(22&ZD095); 中国社会科学院创新工程重大项目“未来产业创新发展研究”;中国社会科学院学科建设“登峰战略”资助计划(DF2023YS24);中国社会科学院青年人才“培远计划”
2026-03-26
2026-03-26
2026-03-26